Focus on your practice
Let Shipleys take the burden of The Law Society accounts compliance
Solicitors
Complying with Law Society accounts regulation is a not only daunting, but can be time consuming. Shipleys aim to take the burden of compliance away from your shoulders leaving you free to concentrate on your practice.
- Tax planning for partners and partnership – reducing the tax burden
- Advice on most tax efficient structure LLP, company, partnership, sole trader or MDPs
- Free periodic health-checks on client account bookkeeping
- Practical advice on accounts recording and management systems
- VAT management
- Practice accounts preparation
Individual accounts and Tax Returns
Latest news & blogs…
Dubai-UK Tax Trap: Return of the Expat
RECENT WARNINGS FROM advisers highlight a growing issue affecting UK expats returning from Dubai and the wider Gulf. Individuals who believed they had legitimately realised gains while non-resident are now facing unexpected UK tax bills—sometimes running into millions.
In today’s Shipleys Tax brief, we highlight a growing and often misunderstood risk for UK expats returning from Dubai and the Gulf: the UK’s temporary non-residence rules can effectively pull previously untaxed overseas gains back into the UK tax net. What appeared to be a clean, tax-free disposal abroad can quickly turn into a multi-million pound liability on return—particularly where individuals come back within five years or inadvertently trigger UK residence sooner than expected.
With HMRC likely to scrutinise high-value cases closely and limited reliance on “exceptional circumstances”, the margin for error is small. The key message is that timing, structure and residence status must be managed proactively—because once you are back in the UK, the planning window is often already closed.
…the UK’s temporary non-residence rules can effectively pull previously untaxed overseas gains back into the UK tax net.
Why Expats are affected
At the centre of the problem is a rule many people either misunderstand or are simply unaware of: the UK’s temporary non-residence rules. These are designed to prevent individuals from leaving the UK for a short period, disposing of valuable assets tax-free in low-tax jurisdictions such as Dubai, and then returning shortly afterwards.
In general terms, if you leave the UK, become non-resident, and then return within five tax years, HMRC can effectively “look back” and tax certain gains you made while abroad. The result is that a disposal which appeared entirely tax-free at the time can later fall back into the UK tax net.
The real-world impact
This is where many expats are being caught out. A common scenario involves the sale of a business or investment during a period of non-residence—often with no local tax in the UAE. However, if the individual returns to the UK too soon, those gains can be taxed here, typically in the year of return.
For larger transactions, the numbers quickly become significant. It is not unusual for individuals to face tax charges in the millions on gains they assumed were outside the UK system.
UK return tax issue
The position is made more complex by the Statutory Residence Test. Simply returning to the UK—even for reasons outside your control—can increase your UK “day count” and trigger tax residence earlier than expected.
A common scenario involves the sale of a business or investment during a period of non-residence—often with no local tax in the UAE. However, if the individual returns to the UK too soon, those gains can be taxed here, typically in the year of return.
Once UK residence is re-established, the temporary non-residence rules may apply. This means the timing of your return is often just as important as the transaction itself.
Case Study 1: £5m Exit → Unexpected UK Tax Charge
A UK entrepreneur moves to Dubai and becomes non-UK resident. During their time abroad, they sell their business for £5 million, realising a full £5 million gain with no local tax. Confident the position is tax-free, they return to the UK after three years. However, because they have not remained non-resident for five full tax years, the UK’s temporary non-residence rules apply. The gain is effectively brought back into the UK tax net and taxed in the year of return, creating a potential liability of around £1.2 million (at 24% CGT, assuming no reliefs). The issue is not the disposal itself—but the timing of the return.
Case Study 2: Extracting £100,000 from a UK Company While Abroad
An individual leaves the UK and becomes non-resident, while retaining ownership of a UK company. During their period overseas, they extract around £100,000 of profits from the company, assuming this can be done free of UK tax while living in Dubai. They later return to the UK within five years.
Because of the temporary non-residence rules, certain income received during the non-resident period can be caught when the individual becomes UK resident again. HMRC may treat those amounts as taxable in the year of return, meaning what was assumed to be tax-free extraction could instead give rise to an unexpected UK income tax liability. As with capital gains, the risk arises not at the point of extraction—but on returning to the UK within the five-year window.
Exceptional Circumstances
Some individuals have looked to rely on the “exceptional circumstances” provisions, which can allow up to 60 days in the UK to be disregarded where events such as war or travel disruption prevent someone from leaving.
However, this is not a ready made guaranteed solution. HMRC apply rules narrowly and it depends heavily on the specific facts. Where alternative travel options exist—such as relocating temporarily to another country rather than returning to the UK—HMRC may take the view that the exemption does not apply.
In practice, relying on this argument carries risk, particularly where large tax liabilities are involved.
A growing risk
In the current climate, this creates real uncertainty. Many expats have returned to the UK due to instability in the region, while others are considering whether to do so.
The difficulty is that the tax consequences are not always clear-cut, and HMRC is likely to examine high-value cases closely—especially where significant gains have been realised during a short period of non-residence.
Planning before your return
From a practical perspective, this is rarely a situation that can be resolved after the event. The timing of your return, your residence position, and the structure of any disposals all interact in ways that can significantly change the outcome.
In some cases, careful planning—such as delaying a return, restructuring transactions, or considering an interim move to a third country—can materially reduce the risk.
Key takeaway
Leaving the UK does not automatically mean your gains are outside the UK tax system. If there is any possibility of returning within certain time limits, those gains may still be within HMRC’s reach.
Need advice?
If you may have exposure to UK tax while living in Dubai or the Gulf—or are looking to optimise your position—it is essential to review your UK tax affairs before taking any action.
This article is for general information only and does not constitute professional advice. Shipleys Tax does not provide free advice by email or phone. You should seek tailored advice before taking any action.
For further assistance or queries, please contact us below:
Leeds: 0113 320 9284 Sheffield: 0114 272 4984
Email: info@shipleystax.com
To discussion your tax position with a specialist please the complete the form below.
VAT Refund for Doctors – A rare win
Healthcare VAT update
VAT refund for locum doctors: a rare win, but claims need careful handling
HMRC’s revised position may allow some NHS bodies, private providers and staffing businesses to revisit historic VAT treatment of locum doctor supplies — but the opportunity needs to be assessed carefully, with the contracts, supply chain and knock-on effects properly reviewed.
Healthcare VAT
A significant VAT development for organisations using or supplying locum doctors
A recent tribunal decision, followed by HMRC accepting that it will revise its policy, has created a genuine opportunity for some organisations to revisit the VAT treatment of locum doctor supplies. For the right fact patterns, this may support historic refund claims. But this is not a blanket refund exercise, and the detail matters.
This issue can affect medical recruitment agencies, NHS bodies, private hospitals, clinics and other healthcare organisations that have either charged VAT on supplies of locum doctors or borne irrecoverable VAT on those supplies.
Key points at a glance
- HMRC has accepted that its historic position was too narrow and has said it will revise its guidance.
- Some historic VAT refund claims may be available, potentially going back up to four years.
- The issue is most relevant where locum doctors were treated as standard-rated supplies.
- Claims need to be reviewed carefully for unjust enrichment, contractual pass-through, partial exemption and input tax consequences.
- Not every arrangement will qualify — the contractual and factual matrix remains critical.
The change follows the tribunal decision in Isle of Wight NHS Trust and others, dealing with the scope of the exemption for the provision of a deputy for a registered medical practitioner. Historically, HMRC took a restrictive view and commonly treated agency-supplied locum doctors as taxable staffing supplies.
HMRC has now accepted that its position needs to be revised. In practical terms, that opens the door for some businesses and healthcare providers to review whether VAT was overdeclared on qualifying locum doctor supplies.
That does not mean every medical staffing arrangement is automatically exempt. It means the old blanket approach is no longer safe, and the underlying arrangements need to be analysed properly.
The opportunity may be relevant to:
- employment businesses and agencies supplying locum doctors
- NHS bodies and private healthcare providers who have paid irrecoverable VAT on locum doctor costs
- medical businesses reviewing historic VAT treatment across multiple contracts or divisions
- groups with partial exemption issues where input tax recovery may also need to be revisited
The commercial position differs depending on where you sit in the supply chain. A supplier considering a refund claim has different issues from a healthcare body which historically bore the VAT cost.
Although the headlines suggest a refund opportunity, the position is rarely as simple as filing a correction and waiting for repayment.
Key issues often include:
- whether the supplies actually fall within the exemption on the facts
- whether any benefit must be passed back under the commercial contract
- whether HMRC may raise unjust enrichment arguments
- whether previously recovered input tax needs to be adjusted
- whether customers’ historic VAT positions need to be reworked
This is why specialist commentators have described HMRC’s revised stance as more than a minor tweak — it has the potential to unlock refunds, but also to trigger knock-on adjustments across the supply chain.
If you are a medical recruitment agency, an NHS trust, or a private healthcare provider that routinely uses locum doctors, it is worth exploring this now — not at year end. These claims are time-limited, evidence-driven and often require a structured approach to documentation, contracts and VAT mechanics.
Just as importantly, HMRC guidance is still evolving. The strongest claims tend to be the ones that are properly evidenced, correctly scoped and aligned with the commercial reality of how supplies were made.
Shipleys Tax advises healthcare organisations and medical staffing suppliers on complex VAT issues, including eligibility reviews, quantification, claim strategy, and the knock-on effects on partial exemption and contracts. We focus on building claims that are commercially sensible and technically robust — and we manage the process so you don’t end up creating a second problem while trying to fix the first.
Where appropriate, we can help with:
- reviewing whether the supplies are capable of exemption
- quantifying historic overdeclared VAT
- assessing unjust enrichment risk
- reviewing contracts and pass-through clauses
- considering partial exemption and input tax consequences
- preparing a measured claim and disclosure strategy
Next step: a confidential VAT review
If you have charged VAT on locum doctor supplies, or absorbed VAT costs you couldn’t recover, now is the time to check your position and quantify the opportunity.
Speak to Shipleys Tax for a confidential review and we’ll assess whether a reclaim is available, estimate the size of the opportunity, and map the safest route forward.
This article is for general information only and does not constitute professional advice. Any VAT reclaim or adjustment should only be pursued after reviewing the specific contractual and factual position.
Business Ownership Structures: Choosing the Right Vehicle
Business structuring
Business ownership structures: choosing the right vehicle
Companies vs LLPs, FICs vs direct ownership, EOTs vs trade sales, and holding companies vs simpler groups — the structure you choose can shape tax, control, flexibility and long-term family wealth.
As the UK tax environment tightens and historic reliefs narrow, strong outcomes are increasingly driven not by last-minute tax planning, but by how a business or investment is owned, structured and positioned for the future.
Whether you are growing a trading company, building a property portfolio, planning succession, or preparing for exit, structure is strategy. The wrong vehicle can quietly erode value, restrict options and expose you to unnecessary tax. The right one can support growth, unlock funding and preserve wealth over time.
Key points at a glance
- Structure affects tax, profit extraction, succession and eventual exit.
- A company will often offer more certainty; an LLP may offer more flexibility.
- FICs can be powerful, but only if share rights and governance are designed properly.
- EOTs remain relevant, but trade sales and hybrid exits may still be more suitable in many cases.
- Holding companies can be highly effective where there is a clear commercial purpose.
- The costliest mistake is often leaving an outdated structure in place for too long.
Company vs LLP: certainty or flexibility?
One of the most common structural decisions is whether to operate through a limited company or a limited liability partnership.
Limited companies often appeal where owners want clearer separation between business profits and personal tax, stronger profit-retention options, access to share-based incentives, and cleaner eventual exit routes.
- Clear separation between business profits and personal tax
- Greater certainty around tax rates and retained profits
- Access to EMI and other share-based incentives
- Cleaner sale and investment routes
LLPs, by contrast, can still be attractive where flexibility matters most, particularly in advisory and professional environments.
- Flexible profit allocation
- Tax transparency
- Familiarity in professional and partner-led businesses
However, LLPs now attract more scrutiny around partner status, disguised employment and NIC exposure. For many growing firms, the historic advantages have narrowed, while companies increasingly provide the more robust long-term platform.
The key question is not simply which structure saves tax today, but which structure still works when the business changes shape.
FICs vs direct ownership
With inheritance tax receipts rising and nil-rate bands effectively constrained, many families are revisiting how valuable trading companies and investment assets are owned.
Direct ownership is simple, but simplicity often comes with trade-offs. Future growth remains in the individual estate, and flexibility on succession can be limited.
Family Investment Companies, when properly structured, can offer a more strategic framework.
- Control retained through voting shares
- Future growth shifted to the next generation
- Better succession planning without outright gifts of core assets
- Integration with trusts and wider estate planning
That said, FICs are not a plug-and-play answer. Poor share rights, weak governance or unsuitable funding can create new tax issues and family tension. Used well, however, they remain one of the most effective long-term planning tools available.
FICs are not just about avoiding tax now. They are about controlling who bears tax later, and on what terms.
EOTs vs trade sales
For founders looking ahead to exit, the choice between an Employee Ownership Trust and a trade sale is rarely just financial. It is also about legacy, control and timing.
EOTs can offer:
- A potentially tax-efficient exit route
- Continuity for the business and team
- Protection of culture and long-term identity
But they also come with real commercial constraints.
- Deferred consideration
- Ongoing governance requirements
- Reduced flexibility as reliefs tighten and rules evolve
Trade sales may instead provide:
- Higher upfront value
- Cleaner separation for founders
- Greater certainty on timing and proceeds
Increasingly, the most effective outcomes are not binary. We often see hybrid solutions, including staged exits, management buy-outs and partial EOT models designed to balance tax, funding and control.
Holding companies vs simpler groups
As businesses mature, the question often shifts from what entity should I trade through? to should I now introduce a holding company?
A well-designed group can add real strategic value.
- Risk can be ring-fenced between activities
- Dividend flows can become more efficient
- Acquisitions can be funded without personal extraction
- Future demergers, disposals or investment rounds can be easier to manage
But complexity for its own sake is rarely wise. Additional entities bring admin, cost and scrutiny. The strongest structures are purpose-led: simple in presentation, but powerful in operation.
Common structural mistakes
- Copying structures used by peers without considering your own risk profile
- Keeping an LLP or direct ownership model long after the business has evolved
- Leaving succession or exit planning until value is already crystallising
- Pursuing tax planning without a credible commercial rationale
- Introducing group structures that create admin without delivering strategic value
These mistakes do not usually fail immediately. They simply become expensive over time.
The Shipleys Tax view
Optimising structure is not about chasing loopholes or reacting late. It is about aligning ownership with where the business, family or investment strategy is actually heading.
Growth, external capital, succession and exit all pull in different directions. The right structure reconciles them before tax becomes a constraint.
The most expensive tax planning is often the kind done too late.
Next step: review the structure before it becomes a problem
If your business or investment structure has not been reviewed in the last three to five years, there is a strong chance it no longer reflects the current tax environment, your growth ambitions, or your succession and exit plans.
Shipleys Tax works with owner-managers, families and boards to stress-test structures against future scenarios before decisions become difficult or irreversible.
This article is for general information only and does not constitute professional advice. Shipleys Tax does not offer free advice by email or phone. Always seek tailored advice before taking action.
Testimonials
“We value the close working relationship we have with Shabeer and the specialist teams at Shipleys Tax...(read more)
Dr K, GP Surgery – Yorkshire
“One of the most frequent issues we had with our previous accountants was not being made aware, in advance... (read more)
FM Medical Practice – Manchester
“Accountants seem to promise the earth but don’t deliver do they? Well we found the opposite. Abdul made himself... (read more)
Mrs Khan – JL Healthcare
Contact us
