With our asset protection & succession planning solutions you can rest easy
Wealth Management & Protection
Asset Protection is essential for protecting and preserving company and family assets from third party claims, divorce, bankruptcy, spendthrift spouses, and youthful improvidence.
Taking the most appropriate action for the protection of your own personal assets is a very complex undertaking, requiring specialist taxation and legal assistance. Asset protection must be commercially driven and cannot be used to avoid paying creditors.
Whilst asset protection is fundamental in considering estate planning, the principle can be extended to other circumstances as well. Two common areas in brief:
PROTECTING AN INDIVIDUAL’S ASSETS
Generally, one of the most efficient ways you can protect assets is by transferring them into a relevant and properly constituted trust. The asset should then be protected against the bankruptcy or divorce of the beneficiaries.
Pitfalls
Firstly, setting up a trust for asset protection will in itself not afford any protection under insolvency or matrimonial laws for beneficiaries if the wrong type of trust is used. We have seen many trusts set up for this purpose that have failed. If one tries to rely on an improperly constituted trust for asset protection the courts may look through it and seek to set it aside.
Secondly, a point which regularly tends to be overlooked (particularly regarding property) on transfer is the mortgage against the property. If the mortgage is more than the original “base” cost of the property (perhaps due to remortgaging) then Capital Gains Tax may be liable if the mortgage is transferred into the trust. Furthermore, such transfer may potentially trigger a Stamp Duty Land Tax charge.
Many think that an outright gift of assets directly to children, siblings, etc will automatically afford protection against divorce or bankruptcy. This may not be the case and is a potentially dangerous presumption to rely on, specialist professional advice should be sought to achieve the desired results. Also such transfers tend to trigger a Capital Gains Tax charge under the deemed disposal rules and again this is often overlooked with significant tax consequences.
Company Property
Businesses may wish to protect vulnerable property and assets against commercial and business risks. Broadly speaking, one way this could be achieved would be by creating a group of companies and transferring the property into this group. The effect of this would be to “ring-fence” the vulnerable asset against any claims of the individual trade in the group.
Pitfalls
It is essential that any asset transfers is done correctly to avoid the property being “linked” to the original business, as this will afford no protection. Of equal importance is that any debts between the group companies would need to be dealt with correctly to provide any real protection.
In all cases there needs to be a legitimate business, commercial or investment driver for the transaction. Furthermore, it is crucial that any such restructuring does not fall foul of insolvency legislation, namely the defrauding of creditors.
Asset protection is an invaluable planning tool which can be used to protect, preserve and devolve family wealth in the right circumstances.
For further information on how you can effectively safeguard you assets and wealth please contact us.
Free consultation
Speak directly to Shipleys Tax about private client, business and strategic tax matters.
LATEST POSTS
The Pensions Inheritance Tax Trap
Inheritance Tax Planning
The Pensions Inheritance Tax Trap
Inheritance Tax Planning

FOR YEARS, PENSIONS have been one of the few places a family could pass on wealth without inheritance tax getting involved. From April 2027, that changes. If your own planning assumed your pension sat outside your estate, it’s worth checking whether that’s still true.
What’s Actually Changing
The Finance Act 2026 received Royal Assent on 18 March 2026. From 6 April 2027, most unused pension funds and death benefits will count towards the estate for Inheritance Tax, taxed at 40% above the nil-rate band.
From 6 April 2027, most unused pension funds and death benefits will count towards the estate for Inheritance Tax, taxed at 40% above the nil-rate band.
There are exceptions: death-in-service payments from a registered scheme remain exempt, as do transfers to a surviving spouse or civil partner. What’s new is the administrative burden too — personal representatives become responsible for reporting and paying any IHT due on pension funds, adding a layer of complexity to estate administration that many families haven’t planned for.
Why This Catches People Out
The pension change doesn’t arrive in isolation — it lands on top of a set of thresholds that have been quietly tightening for years. The standard nil-rate band has been frozen at £325,000 since 2009. The residence nil-rate band tapers away entirely for estates above £2 million. And UK IHT liabilities passed £7 billion for the first time this year (STEP, 30 July 2026).
Put together, a pension that used to sit safely outside the estate now adds directly to a total that’s already being squeezed from every other direction.
A pension that used to sit safely outside the estate now adds directly to a total that’s already being squeezed from every other direction.
Who Should Be Reviewing Their Position Now
- Anyone with a meaningful pension pot they expect to pass on to family
- Estate plans built on the assumption that the pension sat outside the taxable estate
- SIPP or SSAS holders, where pension values can be substantial and flexible
- Couples relying on outdated first-death/second-death assumptions that predate this change
A Sense of Proportion
It’s worth saying plainly: fewer than 1 in 20 estates currently pay any Inheritance Tax at all (Today’s Wills and Probate). This isn’t a change that suddenly affects everyone.
Fewer than 1 in 20 estates currently pay any Inheritance Tax at all.
But frozen thresholds, rising asset values, and pensions joining the estate from 2027 mean more families are being pulled into that minority every year — often without realising it until it’s too late to plan around.
If your own planning assumed a pension sat outside your estate, that assumption has changed. The only way to know where you actually stand is to look at the full picture — property, savings, pensions and reliefs together.
Check your position with our free, private IHT Wealth Health Check. It takes a few minutes, saves your progress if you need to come back to it, and gives you an indicative estimate by secure link.
Start your Wealth Health Check →
Final Thoughts
The pension rule change doesn’t mean every family needs to act immediately, but it does mean an assumption a lot of estate plans were built on no longer holds. A short review now — before April 2027 — is a much better position to be in than finding out after the fact.
A short review now — before April 2027 — is a much better position to be in than finding out after the fact.
For further assistance or queries, please contact us.
Leeds: 0113 320 9284 Sheffield: 0114 272 4984
Email: info@shipleystax.com
Please note that Shipleys Tax do not give free advice by email or telephone. This article is intended for general information only and does not constitute tax or legal advice. Clients should seek professional guidance before making any decisions.
Want more tax tips and news? Sign up to our newsletter below.
This article is for general information only and does not constitute professional advice. Please seek qualified tax advice before taking any action.
Book a consultation
Speak directly to Shipleys Tax about your tax planning needs. We respond within 24 hours.
Speak to Shipleys Tax today
For practical, commercially focused tax advice, contact Shipleys Tax today.
Dubai-UK Tax Trap: Return of the Expat
International Tax
Dubai-UK Tax Trap: Return of the Expat
International Tax

RECENT WARNINGS FROM advisers highlight a growing issue affecting UK expats returning from Dubai and the wider Gulf. Individuals who believed they had legitimately realised gains while non-resident are now facing unexpected UK tax bills—sometimes running into millions.
In today’s Shipleys Tax brief, we highlight a growing and often misunderstood risk for UK expats returning from Dubai and the Gulf: the UK’s temporary non-residence rules can effectively pull previously untaxed overseas gains back into the UK tax net. What appeared to be a clean, tax-free disposal abroad can quickly turn into a multi-million pound liability on return—particularly where individuals come back within five years or inadvertently trigger UK residence sooner than expected.
With HMRC likely to scrutinise high-value cases closely and limited reliance on “exceptional circumstances”, the margin for error is small. The key message is that timing, structure and residence status must be managed proactively—because once you are back in the UK, the planning window is often already closed.
…the UK’s temporary non-residence rules can effectively pull previously untaxed overseas gains back into the UK tax net.
Why Expats are affected
At the centre of the problem is a rule many people either misunderstand or are simply unaware of: the UK’s temporary non-residence rules. These are designed to prevent individuals from leaving the UK for a short period, disposing of valuable assets tax-free in low-tax jurisdictions such as Dubai, and then returning shortly afterwards.
In general terms, if you leave the UK, become non-resident, and then return within five tax years, HMRC can effectively “look back” and tax certain gains you made while abroad. The result is that a disposal which appeared entirely tax-free at the time can later fall back into the UK tax net.
The real-world impact
This is where many expats are being caught out. A common scenario involves the sale of a business or investment during a period of non-residence—often with no local tax in the UAE. However, if the individual returns to the UK too soon, those gains can be taxed here, typically in the year of return.
For larger transactions, the numbers quickly become significant. It is not unusual for individuals to face tax charges in the millions on gains they assumed were outside the UK system.
UK return tax issue
The position is made more complex by the Statutory Residence Test. Simply returning to the UK—even for reasons outside your control—can increase your UK “day count” and trigger tax residence earlier than expected.
A common scenario involves the sale of a business or investment during a period of non-residence—often with no local tax in the UAE. However, if the individual returns to the UK too soon, those gains can be taxed here, typically in the year of return.
Once UK residence is re-established, the temporary non-residence rules may apply. This means the timing of your return is often just as important as the transaction itself.
Case Study 1: £5m Exit → Unexpected UK Tax Charge
A UK entrepreneur moves to Dubai and becomes non-UK resident. During their time abroad, they sell their business for £5 million, realising a full £5 million gain with no local tax. Confident the position is tax-free, they return to the UK after three years. However, because they have not remained non-resident for five full tax years, the UK’s temporary non-residence rules apply. The gain is effectively brought back into the UK tax net and taxed in the year of return, creating a potential liability of around £1.2 million (at 24% CGT, assuming no reliefs). The issue is not the disposal itself—but the timing of the return.
Case Study 2: Extracting £100,000 from a UK Company While Abroad
An individual leaves the UK and becomes non-resident, while retaining ownership of a UK company. During their period overseas, they extract around £100,000 of profits from the company, assuming this can be done free of UK tax while living in Dubai. They later return to the UK within five years.
Because of the temporary non-residence rules, certain income received during the non-resident period can be caught when the individual becomes UK resident again. HMRC may treat those amounts as taxable in the year of return, meaning what was assumed to be tax-free extraction could instead give rise to an unexpected UK income tax liability. As with capital gains, the risk arises not at the point of extraction—but on returning to the UK within the five-year window.
Exceptional Circumstances
Some individuals have looked to rely on the “exceptional circumstances” provisions, which can allow up to 60 days in the UK to be disregarded where events such as war or travel disruption prevent someone from leaving.
However, this is not a ready made guaranteed solution. HMRC apply rules narrowly and it depends heavily on the specific facts. Where alternative travel options exist—such as relocating temporarily to another country rather than returning to the UK—HMRC may take the view that the exemption does not apply.
In practice, relying on this argument carries risk, particularly where large tax liabilities are involved.
A growing risk
In the current climate, this creates real uncertainty. Many expats have returned to the UK due to instability in the region, while others are considering whether to do so.
The difficulty is that the tax consequences are not always clear-cut, and HMRC is likely to examine high-value cases closely—especially where significant gains have been realised during a short period of non-residence.
Planning before your return
From a practical perspective, this is rarely a situation that can be resolved after the event. The timing of your return, your residence position, and the structure of any disposals all interact in ways that can significantly change the outcome.
In some cases, careful planning—such as delaying a return, restructuring transactions, or considering an interim move to a third country—can materially reduce the risk.
Key takeaway
Leaving the UK does not automatically mean your gains are outside the UK tax system. If there is any possibility of returning within certain time limits, those gains may still be within HMRC’s reach.
Need advice?
If you may have exposure to UK tax while living in Dubai or the Gulf—or are looking to optimise your position—it is essential to review your UK tax affairs before taking any action.
This article is for general information only and does not constitute professional advice. Shipleys Tax does not provide free advice by email or phone. You should seek tailored advice before taking any action.
For further assistance or queries, please contact us below:
Leeds: 0113 320 9284 Sheffield: 0114 272 4984
Email: info@shipleystax.com
To discussion your tax position with a specialist please the complete the form below.
This article is for general information only and does not constitute professional advice. Please seek qualified tax advice before taking any action.
Book a consultation
Speak directly to Shipleys Tax about your tax planning needs. We respond within 24 hours.
BOOK A CALL →
Speak to Shipleys Tax today
For practical, commercially focused tax advice, contact Shipleys Tax today.
VAT Refund for Doctors – A rare win
Healthcare Tax
VAT Refund for Doctors – A rare win
Healthcare Tax
A significant VAT development for organisations using or supplying locum doctors
A recent tribunal decision, followed by HMRC accepting that it will revise its policy, has created a genuine opportunity for some organisations to revisit the VAT treatment of locum doctor supplies. For the right fact patterns, this may support historic refund claims. But this is not a blanket refund exercise, and the detail matters.
This issue can affect medical recruitment agencies, NHS bodies, private hospitals, clinics and other healthcare organisations that have either charged VAT on supplies of locum doctors or borne irrecoverable VAT on those supplies.
This article is for general information only and does not constitute professional advice. Please seek qualified tax advice before taking any action.
Book a consultation
Speak directly to Shipleys Tax about your tax planning needs. We respond within 24 hours.
Speak to Shipleys Tax today
For practical, commercially focused tax advice, contact Shipleys Tax today.
Business Ownership Structures: Choosing the Right Vehicle
Business Tax Planning
Business Ownership Structures: Choosing the Right Vehicle
Business structuring
Business ownership structures: choosing the right vehicle

Book a consultation
Speak directly to Shipleys Tax about your tax planning needs. We respond within 24 hours.
Companies vs LLPs, FICs vs direct ownership, EOTs vs trade sales, and holding companies vs simpler groups — the structure you choose can shape tax, control, flexibility and long-term family wealth.
As the UK tax environment tightens and historic reliefs narrow, strong outcomes are increasingly driven not by last-minute tax planning, but by how a business or investment is owned, structured and positioned for the future.
Whether you are growing a trading company, building a property portfolio, planning succession, or preparing for exit, structure is strategy. The wrong vehicle can quietly erode value, restrict options and expose you to unnecessary tax. The right one can support growth, unlock funding and preserve wealth over time.
Key points at a glance
- Structure affects tax, profit extraction, succession and eventual exit.
- A company will often offer more certainty; an LLP may offer more flexibility.
- FICs can be powerful, but only if share rights and governance are designed properly.
- EOTs remain relevant, but trade sales and hybrid exits may still be more suitable in many cases.
- Holding companies can be highly effective where there is a clear commercial purpose.
- The costliest mistake is often leaving an outdated structure in place for too long.
Company vs LLP: certainty or flexibility?
One of the most common structural decisions is whether to operate through a limited company or a limited liability partnership.
Limited companies often appeal where owners want clearer separation between business profits and personal tax, stronger profit-retention options, access to share-based incentives, and cleaner eventual exit routes.
- Clear separation between business profits and personal tax
- Greater certainty around tax rates and retained profits
- Access to EMI and other share-based incentives
- Cleaner sale and investment routes
LLPs, by contrast, can still be attractive where flexibility matters most, particularly in advisory and professional environments.
- Flexible profit allocation
- Tax transparency
- Familiarity in professional and partner-led businesses
However, LLPs now attract more scrutiny around partner status, disguised employment and NIC exposure. For many growing firms, the historic advantages have narrowed, while companies increasingly provide the more robust long-term platform.
The key question is not simply which structure saves tax today, but which structure still works when the business changes shape.
FICs vs direct ownership
With inheritance tax receipts rising and nil-rate bands effectively constrained, many families are revisiting how valuable trading companies and investment assets are owned.
Direct ownership is simple, but simplicity often comes with trade-offs. Future growth remains in the individual estate, and flexibility on succession can be limited.
Family Investment Companies, when properly structured, can offer a more strategic framework.
- Control retained through voting shares
- Future growth shifted to the next generation
- Better succession planning without outright gifts of core assets
- Integration with trusts and wider estate planning
That said, FICs are not a plug-and-play answer. Poor share rights, weak governance or unsuitable funding can create new tax issues and family tension. Used well, however, they remain one of the most effective long-term planning tools available.
FICs are not just about avoiding tax now. They are about controlling who bears tax later, and on what terms.
EOTs vs trade sales
For founders looking ahead to exit, the choice between an Employee Ownership Trust and a trade sale is rarely just financial. It is also about legacy, control and timing.
EOTs can offer:
- A potentially tax-efficient exit route
- Continuity for the business and team
- Protection of culture and long-term identity
But they also come with real commercial constraints.
- Deferred consideration
- Ongoing governance requirements
- Reduced flexibility as reliefs tighten and rules evolve
Trade sales may instead provide:
- Higher upfront value
- Cleaner separation for founders
- Greater certainty on timing and proceeds
Increasingly, the most effective outcomes are not binary. We often see hybrid solutions, including staged exits, management buy-outs and partial EOT models designed to balance tax, funding and control.
Holding companies vs simpler groups
As businesses mature, the question often shifts from what entity should I trade through? to should I now introduce a holding company?
A well-designed group can add real strategic value.
- Risk can be ring-fenced between activities
- Dividend flows can become more efficient
- Acquisitions can be funded without personal extraction
- Future demergers, disposals or investment rounds can be easier to manage
But complexity for its own sake is rarely wise. Additional entities bring admin, cost and scrutiny. The strongest structures are purpose-led: simple in presentation, but powerful in operation.
Common structural mistakes
- Copying structures used by peers without considering your own risk profile
- Keeping an LLP or direct ownership model long after the business has evolved
- Leaving succession or exit planning until value is already crystallising
- Pursuing tax planning without a credible commercial rationale
- Introducing group structures that create admin without delivering strategic value
These mistakes do not usually fail immediately. They simply become expensive over time.
The Shipleys Tax view
Optimising structure is not about chasing loopholes or reacting late. It is about aligning ownership with where the business, family or investment strategy is actually heading.
Growth, external capital, succession and exit all pull in different directions. The right structure reconciles them before tax becomes a constraint.
The most expensive tax planning is often the kind done too late.
Next step: review the structure before it becomes a problem
If your business or investment structure has not been reviewed in the last three to five years, there is a strong chance it no longer reflects the current tax environment, your growth ambitions, or your succession and exit plans.
Shipleys Tax works with owner-managers, families and boards to stress-test structures against future scenarios before decisions become difficult or irreversible.
This article is for general information only and does not constitute professional advice. Shipleys Tax does not offer free advice by email or phone. Always seek tailored advice before taking action.
STRUCTURE REVIEW
Structure review
Speak directly to Shipleys Tax about ownership structures, succession planning and exit strategy.
RELATED INSIGHTS
The Pensions Inheritance Tax Trap
August 3rd, 2026|0 Comments
Dubai-UK Tax Trap: Return of the Expat
March 29th, 2026|0 Comments
VAT Refund for Doctors – A rare win
January 21st, 2026|0 Comments
CONTACT US
Speak to Shipleys Tax today
For practical, commercially focused tax advice, contact Shipleys Tax today.
Contact Shipleys today
Want to know how Shipleys can help you with practical tax planning through innovative ideas? Let’s talk. Call or email us directly and a member of our team will be in touch within 48 hours.

