Company Tax planning
Company
Reorganisation
Company A Limited owned an asset worth a substantial amount. The asset was in a company in which the owners were involved in entrepreneurial ventures. The directors were looking to continue with their speculative business ventures yet wanted to protect the asset from the commercial risk.
Comment: Shipleys Tax undertook a group reconstruction which resulted in the asset being transferred to another entity without any immediate tax liability to the company or its shareholders.
Partial Sale
Company X Group Limited was looking to sell off two subsidiaries to a buyer in exchange for shares. With the structure the client had in place, the sale of the two companies would have resulted in a tax liability of around £1.8 million on a paper gain and also caused the shareholders to lose favoured tax status.
Comment: Shipleys devised a group reorganisation which resulted in the two companies being sold with no immediate tax liability to the group or its shareholders.
Share schemes
Company Y Limited wished to reward and tie in employees. Bonus schemes were expensive and arbitrary and caused cash constraints.
Comment: Shipleys implemented a tax efficient share scheme arrangement. This achieved the client’s objectives and also gave the founder shareholders the opportunity to establish an alternative exit strategy.
Parallel companies
Company A Limited had a very complex company structure comprising of a number of non-trading intermediate holding and parallel companies which served no particular purpose and was not a tax efficient structure. The structure had arisen as a result of a piecemeal acquisitions and shareholder changes which was administratively difficult to manage. The parallel companies were related and had numerous inter company loans which the directors wanted to make tax efficient.
Comment: Shipleys implemented a tax efficient group reorganisation and put measures into place which would enable them to take full control of their inter company loans with minimal tax consequences.
Latest news & blogs…
Demystifying Deductible Expenses for Self-Employed Dentists

WHILST NOT AS painful as the dreaded root canal surgery, managing tax as a self-employed associate dentist can be a challenging task – especially when it comes to understanding tax deductible expenses.
In today’s Shipleys Tax article, we will set out a basic guide to various deductible expenses, including travel, subsistence and accommodation: and we look at some problem scenarios.
Travel Expenses
Travel expenses can be a significant cost for associate dentists who need to visit different practices, attend professional courses, or participate in conferences. The good news is that these expenses can be tax-deductible if they are deemed necessary for the business. Here are some guidelines for deducting travel expenses:
a. Ordinary commuting costs between your home and a fixed workplace are generally not deductible. However, travel expenses between different workplaces or temporary work locations are deductible.
b. Expenses related to attending professional courses or conferences, including registration fees, can be claimed if they are relevant to your work as a dentist.
c. If you use your personal vehicle for business purposes, you can claim either the actual expenses incurred (such as fuel, maintenance, and insurance) or a standard mileage rate as set by HMRC.
Remember to keep accurate records of your travel expenses, including receipts, invoices, and a log of your business-related trips.
The good news is that these expenses can be tax-deductible if they are deemed necessary for the business.
Subsistence Expenses
Subsistence expenses, such as meals and beverages, can be deductible if incurred while away from your regular place of work for business purposes. Keep the following guidelines in mind:
a. The expense must be “reasonable” and not lavish or extravagant. HMRC have specific rules and limits on the amount you can claim for meals in certain circumstances.
b. The cost of meals during regular working hours is generally not deductible unless you are away from your usual place of work for a business purpose.
c. If you attend a professional conference or course that includes meals as part of the registration fee, you can claim the entire fee as a deductible expense.
Accommodation Expenses
Accommodation expenses incurred while traveling for business purposes can be tax-deductible. However, specific criteria must be met:
a. The trip must be primarily for business purposes, and the accommodation must be necessary for you to carry out your work-related duties.
b. The cost of the accommodation should be reasonable and not extravagant. HMRC have specific guidelines on the maximum amounts that can be claimed.
If you attend a professional conference or course that includes meals as part of the registration fee, you can claim the entire fee as a deductible expense.
c. Generally, if the trip includes personal activities or vacation time, you must allocate the expenses between the business and personal portions of the trip. Only the business-related portion of the accommodation expenses can be claimed as a deduction.
Some problem scenarios
Let’s look at a few oft recurring travel scenarios that self-employed associate dentists seem to encounter and how the rules for tax deductions might apply:
Scenario 1: Combined Business and Personal Travel
You plan to attend a three-day dental conference in another city. After the conference, you decide to stay for two additional days to explore the city and visit friends.
In this scenario, you must allocate the accommodation expenses between the business and personal portions of the trip. You can claim the accommodation expenses for the three days of the conference as a tax deduction, but the expenses for the additional two days of personal activities are not deductible.
Scenario 2: Accompanying Spouse or Family Members
You are invited to speak at a dental seminar in another country. Your spouse and children accompany you on the trip, but they do not participate in any business-related activities.
In this case, you can claim only the portion of the accommodation expenses attributable to your own stay. If you have to pay extra to accommodate your spouse and children, you cannot claim that additional cost as a tax deduction.
Scenario 3: Business Trip with Side Trips for Personal Reasons
You attend a week-long dental course in another city. During your stay, you decide to take a day trip to a nearby tourist attraction for personal enjoyment.
In this situation, you can still claim the accommodation expenses for the entire week as a tax deduction, as the primary purpose of your trip remains business-related. However, you cannot deduct the expenses related to your side trip, such as admission fees to the tourist attraction or additional transportation costs.
However, you cannot deduct the expenses related to your side trip, such as admission fees to the tourist attraction or additional transportation costs.
Scenario 4: Prolonged Business Stay with Periods of Personal Time
You need to work at a temporary dental practice in a different city for three months. During this time, you rent an apartment for accommodation. On weekends, you often engage in personal activities, such as sightseeing or visiting friends.
In this case, you can generally claim the full cost of the apartment rental as a tax deduction, as the primary purpose of your stay is business-related. The fact that you engage in personal activities during your free time does not disqualify the accommodation expenses from being deductible.
Computer says no…?
All good and well you may think. Not quite unfortunately. The UK tax system has a sneaky habit of throwing a rule or two to scupper your expenses claim, in this case the principle of “duality”. The duality principle refers to the idea that an expense can only be tax deductible if it is incurred wholly and exclusively for the purpose of the trade, profession, or vocation. HMRC frequently uses this rule to deny expenses claims.
The duality principle refers to the idea that an expense can only be tax deductible if it is incurred wholly and exclusively for the purpose of the trade, profession, or vocation. HMRC frequently uses this rule to deny expenses claims.
This principle emphasises the need to accurately allocate expenses between business and personal activities for complex travel and accommodation scenarios. Proper understanding of this rule will also help overcome HMRC challenges and maximizes tax deductions for your dental self employment.
Please note that the information provided in this article should not be considered tax or legal advice. It is always recommended to consult with a tax professional or accountant to receive personalized advice tailored to your specific circumstances and to ensure compliance with the latest tax regulations.
If you are affected by any of the issues above and would like more information, please call 0114 272 4984 or email info@shipleystax.com.
Please note that Shipleys Tax do not give free advice by email or telephone.
Happy Eid Mubarak!

A very happy Eid Mubarak to all those celebrating the end of the fasting month of Ramadan from the Shipleys Tax Team.
Hope you have a great few days!
Tax planning with Shares and Spouses

WE CHERISH OUR partners for a multitude of reasons, yet tax planning rarely ranks among the top. Nevertheless, in light of the unprecedented tax burden faced by taxpayers today, planning with shares and spouses can be a valuable tool for both individuals and businesses to manage their tax liabilities effectively.
In today’s Shipleys Tax article, we explore some of the basic considerations for tax planning with shares and spouses and the traps that one should avoid.
Shares and Spouses
One of the most common tax planning strategies involving shares and spouses is the transfer of shares between spouses. This can be done to take advantage of lower tax rates or to transfer ownership of a company or business. By utilising tax free allowances by paying a spouse a small salary, usually up to the primary threshold, so as to incur no PAYE or NICs but still maintain entitlement to state benefits and the state pension. The company gets corporation tax relief on the salaries, and earnings are then topped up by dividends.
However, it is essential to understand the tax implications of such transfers and to ensure that they are done correctly.
One of the most common tax planning strategies involving shares and spouses is the transfer of shares between spouses
Firstly, when transferring shares between spouses, it is important to consider the capital gains tax (CGT) implications. In the UK, CGT is a tax on the profits made from selling assets, including shares. The current CGT allowance for individuals is £12,300 for the tax year 2022/23. However, when transferring shares between spouses, the transfer is not subject to CGT. Instead, the transfer is deemed to take place at market value, and the new owner of the shares takes on the original cost of the shares for future CGT calculations.
Secondly, it is important to consider the income tax implications of transferring shares between spouses. Dividends from shares are subject to income tax, and if a higher-earning spouse transfers shares to a lower-earning spouse, they may be able to take advantage of the lower tax rates. However, there are rules in place to prevent spouses from using this strategy to avoid tax. The so-called “settlements legislation” applies to situations where income is transferred between spouses in order to take advantage of lower tax rates. In such cases, the income will be taxed as if it had been earned by the higher-earning spouse.
The Traps to Avoid
When it comes to tax planning with shares and spouses, there are several traps that individuals must avoid. These include:
- Failing to properly document the transfer of shares between spouses – It is essential to document any transfers of shares between spouses to ensure that the transfer is valid and to avoid any disputes with HMRC.
- Failing to consider the long-term implications of the transfer – Transferring shares between spouses can have long-term implications, such as future CGT liabilities, and individuals must consider these implications before making any transfers.
- Failing to comply with the rules on settlements – The settlements legislation can be complex, and individuals must ensure that they comply with the rules to avoid being subject to additional tax liabilities.
Dividends from shares are subject to income tax, and if a higher-earning spouse transfers shares to a lower-earning spouse, they may be able to take advantage of the lower tax rates
- Alphabet share schemes – companies may issue so-called “Alphabet shares” to spouses, which restrict shareholders voting rights, and/or their right of income to dividends, or capital on a winding up, based on performance or some other metric. Gifting or issuing such shares to such key individuals could be argued by HMRC to be “substantially a right to income”, and therefore would fall foul of settlements legislation above.
If however such shares issued under a carefully drafted alphabet share scheme, have equal and full minority voting rights applied, then broadly HMRC would not be able to attack this arrangement as a “settlement”, as always there are exceptions to this however and it is best to take professional advice.
Conclusion
Tax planning with shares and spouses can be a valuable tool for managing tax liabilities effectively. However, individuals must be aware of the potential traps and pitfalls that can arise when using this strategy. By properly documenting any transfers of shares, considering the long-term implications of the transfer, and complying with the rules on settlements, individuals can avoid these traps and ensure that their tax planning strategies are effective and compliant with tax rules.
If you are affected by any of the issues above and would like more information, please call 0114 272 4984 or email info@shipleystax.com.
Please note that Shipleys Tax do not give free advice by email or telephone.
Testimonials
“We value the close working relationship we have with Shabeer and the specialist teams at Shipleys Tax...(read more)
Dr K, GP Surgery – Yorkshire
“One of the most frequent issues we had with our previous accountants was not being made aware, in advance... (read more)
FM Medical Practice – Manchester
“Accountants seem to promise the earth but don’t deliver do they? Well we found the opposite. Abdul made himself... (read more)
Mrs Khan – JL Healthcare
Contact us