Let our clients tell you about us
Testimonials
The greatest compliment we receive is a client recommendation. Below are just a few of the kind words our clients have shared about working with Shipleys Tax.
The value of a close relationship
“We value the close working relationship we have with Shabeer and the specialist teams at Shipleys Tax and have found them very knowledgeable, friendly and quick to respond to our queries. Shabeer has attended several of our practice meetings and his advice regarding partnership succession issues has been invaluable. I would highly recommend Shipleys to other GP practices.”
Dr Khan, GP Surgery — Yorkshire
Dubai expat return — saved from a £1.2m UK tax bill
“After selling my business in Dubai I was planning to return to the UK the following year. A friend suggested I speak to Shipleys Tax before booking flights and it turned out to be the best decision I made. Shabeer quickly identified that I was about to walk into the temporary non-residence rules and face a UK tax bill in excess of £1 million on gains I had assumed were safely outside the UK net. With their guidance we restructured the timing of my return and my affairs completely legitimately — the tax saving was life changing. I cannot thank them enough.”
Imran — UK Entrepreneur, returning from Dubai
Fixed fee promise and no surprise bills
“One of the most frequent issues we had with our previous accountants was not being made aware, in advance, of the fees to be charged. Shipleys Tax were a breath of fresh air, always completely transparent — and no charges for any phone calls or meetings.”
FM Medical Practice — Manchester
CGT planning for dental practice sale
“Selling the dental practice I had built over 25 years was always going to be emotional, but I wasn’t prepared for the tax complexity. Abdul and the team at Shipleys Tax walked me through every option, explained the capital gains tax implications in plain English, and structured the sale in a way that saved me a significant amount of tax. Their attention to detail and proactive planning made all the difference — I only wish I had spoken to them sooner.”
Kevin — Derby, Dental Practice Owner
Property portfolio incorporation
“After Section 24 mortgage interest changes my buy-to-let portfolio had become a nightmare. I was paying tax on income I was never actually seeing. Shipleys Tax took the time to properly assess whether incorporation made sense for my specific situation — no hard sell, just honest advice. They modelled out ten years of projections, handled the entire restructuring including the SDLT planning, and now my portfolio is fit for the future. Genuine property tax specialists, not just accountants who dabble.”
Rashid — Leeds, Property Investor
Partner-led client service promise
“Accountants seem to promise the earth but don’t deliver do they? Well we found the opposite. Abdul made himself available on so many occasions and even on weekends when we had a really major panic with a sale. Really grateful to him for his advice and foresight. If we needed to talk, they listen. It really is that simple.”
Sabina — JL Healthcare
Inheritance tax mitigation and estate planning
“After losing my husband I was concerned about the inheritance tax exposure on our family estate. Shabeer took the time to properly understand our family situation before recommending anything. The advice I received on IHT mitigation was clear, practical and completely tailored to us — not an off-the-shelf solution. My children and grandchildren are now in a much better position and I have genuine peace of mind. I cannot recommend Shipleys highly enough.”
Louise — Leeds
Family Investment Company succession planning
“My family business had reached a point where I wanted to start bringing my children into ownership without giving up control or triggering a huge tax bill. Shipleys Tax designed and implemented a Family Investment Company structure that achieved everything I needed — I retain voting control, future growth passes to the next generation, and the inheritance tax position is now properly protected. Shabeer took the time to understand our family dynamics as well as the numbers, which was invaluable.”
James — Sheffield, Family Business Owner
GP practice incorporation
“Our GP partnership had been considering incorporation for years but no one could give us a straight answer on whether it was right for us. Shipleys Tax produced a detailed review of our specific circumstances, modelled out the tax savings over five years, and handled the entire incorporation process end to end. The transition was seamless and the tax savings have already exceeded their projections. A genuinely specialist firm that understands GPs.”
Gill — Manchester, GP Practice
HMRC tax investigation defence
“When HMRC opened an enquiry into my company, my existing accountants were completely out of their depth. A colleague recommended Shipleys Tax and within a week they had taken over the correspondence, identified the technical issues HMRC had got wrong, and put together a robust response. The case was closed within months with a fraction of the adjustment HMRC originally proposed. Their calm, experienced handling of what was a genuinely stressful time made all the difference. Having ex-HMRC Inspectors on their team was clearly a huge advantage.”
Dr Ahmed — Manchester, Private Practice Consultant
VAT reclaim for locum doctor agency
“We had been charging VAT on locum doctor supplies for years, assuming HMRC’s position was settled. When Shipleys Tax flagged the Isle of Wight tribunal decision to us, they didn’t just send a generic update — they actually reviewed our contracts, ran the numbers on partial exemption, and built a properly evidenced reclaim. The recovery was substantial and the process was completely painless on our side. The fact they understand both the VAT technical side and the commercial reality of running an agency made all the difference.”
Medical Staffing Agency — Yorkshire
Employee Ownership Trust exit
“I had built my company over 20 years and wanted an exit that looked after my staff rather than selling to a trade buyer who would strip it down. Shipleys Tax walked me through the Employee Ownership Trust route in detail — the pros, the cons, and honestly the complications too. They didn’t just sell me a product. When we went ahead they handled the entire transaction, including the HMRC clearance, and the result was exactly what I had hoped for. The team continues to thrive and my legacy is intact.”
David — Leeds, Business Founder
Going above and beyond
“I came to Shipleys Tax through a personal recommendation, at the time I was in a transitional period. I had already taken some steps towards self-employment, however I had no idea what I was doing and the information I received from others was inaccurate for what I needed. I needed someone to understand and help me resolve all the mess I was creating.
Abdul stepped in just at the right time. He dealt with all the paperwork, as well as giving me valuable advice on how to save tax, which was brilliant. I felt I was looked after, my needs taken care of without me feeling like being a burden.
I would recommend Shipleys to anyone that wants an experienced professional team. They are always eager to help and support your company and offer advice when needed, but above all they are always willing to go over and beyond expectation every time.”
Bella
Latest news & blogs…
TAXING BEAUTY – HMRC’s new approach to VAT for cosmetic procedures
DUE TO THE rapid growth of the private cosmetic medical sector in the UK, some noticeable shifts have begun to appear in HMRC’s approach to VAT in the cosmetic medical sector. HMRC have reportedly now established a dedicated team to examine the VAT implications of treatments such as Botox, skin fillers and facial peels.
In today’s Shipleys Tax brief, we consider whether HMRC’s position is now seemingly leaning towards categorizing certain treatments as standard-rated for VAT rather than exempt.
Historical Stance vs. Current Direction
While traditionally, treatments aimed at medical purposes have often been exempt from VAT, those perceived as purely cosmetic have leaned towards being standard rated (20%). This distinct separation is becoming more blurred. Procedures that serve dual purposes, such as Botox, now find themselves in a VAT grey area. There’s a growing inclination from HMRC to classify certain ambiguous cosmetic treatments as standard-rated unless they solidly fit within the medical exemption.
There’s a growing inclination from HMRC to classify certain ambiguous cosmetic treatments as standard-rated unless they solidly fit within the medical exemption.
Recent court case
In one recent tribunal case involving a prominent skin clinic, these VAT issues were brought to the forefront. The clinic had applied for a VAT credit for a specific timeframe, a claim which HMRC challenged asserting that the services during that period were not exempt from VAT.
During the tribunal, a wealth of evidence was presented, including testimonies from the clinic’s lead practitioner, a highly qualified registered medical professional who had pivoted to ‘aesthetic medicine’ and operated the clinic, offering an array of cosmetic treatments.
While the tribunal acknowledged the lead practitioner’s expertise and dedication to professional ethics, it ruled that that cosmetic treatments provided by the clinic did not qualify for VAT medical exemption. It found that the treatments were for “aesthetic reasons” and not for clinical reasons.
The Impact
This evolving stance means that businesses offering cosmetic treatments need to be extra vigilant. The ruling underscores the importance of the nature and intent behind services in determining VAT status, emphasizing the need for meticulous record-keeping and understanding of HMRC’s evolving views on VAT exemptions in the cosmetic medical sector.
…cosmetic treatments provided by the clinic did not qualify for VAT medical exemption. It found that the treatments were for “aesthetic reasons” and not for clinical reasons.
How Shipleys Tax can help
With the landscape shifting, our Shipleys VAT team can help ensure that your practice remains compliant, anticipating and adapting to any changes in HMRC’s perspective on VAT within the sector.
Adapting to change is vital in today’s dynamic environment and ensuring your practice stays ahead and compliant is crucial to avoid falling foul of the legislation.
If you would like assistance, or would like more information, please call 0114 272 4984 or email info@shipleystax.com.
Please note that Shipleys Tax do not give free advice by email or telephone.
Want more tax tips and news? Sign up to our newsletter below.
Offshore Companies and Rental Income Tax
HMRC IS SENDING letters to some offshore (non-resident) companies that appear to have failed to notify that they own commercial property in the UK.
In today’s Shipleys Tax note we look at what this means for overseas landlords owning property in the UK and what you need to do to avoid falling foul of HMRC’s rules.
From Income Tax to Corporation Tax
Before 6 April 2020, rental income garnered by non-UK resident companies fell under the domain of income tax. However, post this date, these companies are required to adhere to corporation tax rules for any liability.
HMRC’s Requirement for Registration
HMRC is actively reaching out to companies that have so far missed registering under either of the tax rules. It appears that their knowledge about these companies and their property holdings originates from HM Land Registry or the newly established Register of Overseas Entities, which itself went live this year on 31 January 2023.
Before 6 April 2020, rental income garnered by non-UK resident companies fell under the domain of income tax. However, post this date, these companies are required to adhere to corporation tax rules…
In these letters, companies are prompted to fill out a certificate to ascertain if there’s a need to declare any unpaid tax on their rental income. Depending on the company’s declaration, they are guided either towards the voluntary disclosure procedure or, in cases of potential tax fraud, towards the contractual disclosure facility.
Additionally, the letters urge companies to evaluate if the UK’s complicated “transfer of assets abroad provisions” apply, especially concerning UK-resident individuals who might have an interest in the company’s income or capital.
Interestingly, this isn’t the first instance of such letters being dispatched. Similar letters were sent to offshore corporates owning UK properties in the past, chiefly concerning residential property income and potential tax liabilities under the annual tax on enveloped dwellings (ATED).
A Warning and the Potential Consequences
HMRC’s current communication comes with a clear warning: Companies are given a window of 40 days to either initiate the disclosure process or provide an explanation if they believe they’re exempt from disclosure. Failure to respond could see HMRC estimating what it believes the company owes, potentially sparking an investigation. This could further culminate in added penalties. The statement in the letter is quite straightforward, stating, “If we later find that you have not told us everything, we’ll view this very seriously.”
Alternative Disclosure Methods?
While the letters might sound imposing, recipients should note that they’re not legally bound to complete and return the certificates. As per the guidance from the Chartered Institute of Taxation (CIOT), there are other disclosure methods at their disposal, some of which might be more suitable than those delineated in HMRC’s letter.
Companies are given a window of 40 days to either initiate the disclosure process or provide an explanation if they believe they’re exempt from disclosure.
According to the CIOT, HMRC cannot compel a taxpayer to use any specific method for their disclosure. Depending on the situation, other methods may be more apt. Therefore, taxpayers and companies should be discerning, consider the unique facts of their situation, and seek advice on the best disclosure approach.
Conclusion
For non-UK resident companies with UK property assets, staying abreast of the latest tax regulations is paramount. With HMRC actively reaching out to those who haven’t registered under the updated tax rules, it’s crucial to understand one’s obligations and rights, ensuring compliance while also leveraging the most appropriate disclosure methods. If in doubt, always seek expert guidance to navigate these complex tax waters.
If you would like assistance, or would like more information, please call 0114 272 4984 or email info@shipleystax.com.
Please note that Shipleys Tax do not give free advice by email or telephone.
Want more tax tips and news? Sign up to our newsletter below.
Tax Planning with Beneficial Interest Company Trusts – the challenges for Landlords
THE EVER-CHANGING landscape of UK tax law has prompted landlords to explore alternative legal structures for tax efficient property ownership. One such structure gaining more attention recently is the Beneficial Interest Company Trust (BICT). However, as will be seem below this complex model is not without its challenges and debate.
In today’s Shipleys Tax brief we will look at the workings of a BICT, its potential benefits, drawbacks, and the key considerations for landlords considering this route.
What is a Beneficial Interest Company Trust (BICT)?
A Beneficial Interest Company Trust (BICT) is a legal structure that has gained popularity among landlords in the UK, particularly following changes to the infamous Section 24 income tax relief in 2017 for rental income. BICTs seemingly allows landlords to strategically manage the economic value of their properties in a company, while retaining the “legal” title of the property, and thus the mortgage, in their personal name.
BICTs: The Appeal for Landlords
There are several key reasons why landlords are increasingly adopting BICTs. The trust structure purportedly enables landlords to enjoy personal mortgage rates on properties, while treating them as company assets from a tax perspective. In light of the restrictions on interest relief announced in 2015, landlords can put the rental income from personally held property (and related borrowing costs) through a Limited Company to help minimize their tax liability.
BICTs allows landlords to strategically manage the economic value of their properties in a company, while retaining the “legal” title of the property, and thus the mortgage, in their personal name.
Perceived Key Advantages of BICTs for Landlords
- Mitigating the Impact of Section 24 Interest Relief Restriction: BICTs can help landlords offset mortgage interest against rental income, thus reducing their tax liability.
- Preserving Personal Tax Allowances: BICTs allow landlords to ensure rental income falls within the corporation tax regime, not subject to personal income tax. This can maintain access to personal tax allowances, beneficial when rental income is taxed at higher individual tax rates.
- Future Planning and Flexibility: BICTs offer flexibility for estate planning and asset transfer to future generations. The trust structure allows for the addition of beneficiaries or changing the ownership structure without transferring the property’s legal title.
The Risks and Challenges of BICTs
While BICTs might seem like a silver bullet, they are not without significant complexities and potential pitfalls. Landlords should exercise caution and thoroughly consider these key challenges:
- Complex Legal and Tax Implications: BICTs involve intricate legal and tax arrangements. Ensuring compliance and avoiding unintended consequences requires advice from professionals well-versed in trust law and tax legislation. There is debate within the tax profession about this structure. Some have suggested potential mortgage fraud, mismatch of income and mortgage interest relief, and likely challenges from HMRC on the basis that such a structure is “tax-motivated” rather than commercially motivated and therefore subject to anti-avoidance legislation. HMRC will not provide approval for BICTs because these have nothing whatsoever to do with tax. This is because the company itself has no tax advantages over and above any other form of UK limited company.
- Lender’s Reluctance: Some lenders are wary of BICTs, fearing they could be seen as contrived and fall foul of HMRC anti-avoidance legislation. This perception could impact a landlord’s ability to secure mortgage finance, and if the BICT is deemed a tax avoidance scheme, landlords could face a hefty tax bill.
- Costs and Administrative Burden: Establishing and maintaining a BICT can be costly. The ongoing administrative responsibilities include filing annual accounts and tax returns for the SPV, which can be time-consuming.
There is debate within the tax profession about this structure. Some have suggested potential mortgage fraud, mismatch of income and mortgage interest relief, and likely challenges from HMRC…
- Potential Future Legislative Changes: Tax laws and regulations evolve over time. There’s no guarantee that the current tax advantages linked with BICTs will persist. Future legislative changes could impact the viability of BICTs.
- Financing Challenges: Transitioning properties into a BICT can create financing difficulties. Lenders often have different criteria and loan products for SPVs compared to individual landlords.
To BICT or Not to BICT
BICTs have provided some landlords with a strategy to navigate the tax challenges, but they are not a one-size-fits-all solution, nor are they a sure fit. Each landlord’s circumstances and objectives are unique, making it crucial to conduct a thorough assessment and seek professional advice tailored to your specific situation before considering such a legal structure.
Always remember that tax planning is not a short-term endeavour. Before moving forward with a BICT or any other tax planning strategy, taxpayers need to ensure that they are comfortable with the potential outcomes and have considered all available options.
Consulting with a qualified tax adviser and a mortgage consultant before making any decisions is crucial. As the tax difference between personal name and limited company rates continues to narrow, the cost-effectiveness of BICTs may also change.
In conclusion, while the BICT is an available solution for some landlords, understanding its pros and cons is essential to making an informed decision. Remember, effective tax planning is about strategy, not just short-term gains.
If you are affected by any of the issues above and would like more information, please call 0114 272 4984 or email info@shipleystax.com.
Please note that Shipleys Tax do not give free advice by email or telephone.
Want more tax tips and news? Sign up to our newsletter below.
Contact us
