HMRC’s MUCH VAUNTED Making Tax Digital (MTD) for Income Tax went live on 6 April 2026, and the first quarterly deadline has already been and gone. This represents a major shift in income tax reporting in the UK and is not without controversy. If you’re a sole trader or landlord with income over £50,000, the new HMRC digital reporting rules will apply to you. What many have been putting off is now the system you are actually working under – not a future date on the calendar.

In today’s Shipleys Tax brief we look at the general impact of these changes and what needs to be done to avoid falling foul of the new system despite promises of a soft touch by HMRC.

What’s actually changing

From 6 April 2026, sole traders and landlords with qualifying income over £50,000 must keep digital records and send quarterly updates to HMRC using MTD compatible software. Qualifying income is gross turnover from self-employment and property combined, before expenses, based on the tax return already submitted for 2024-25. The familiar annual Self Assessment return is being phased out for this group, replaced by four quarterly updates plus a Final Declaration.

The first deadline has already passed

The four quarterly deadlines for 2026/27 fall on 7 August 2026 (covering 6 April to 5 July), 7 November 2026, 7 February 2027 and 7 May 2027, with a Final Declaration due by 31 January 2028 replacing the old tax return deadline. That first deadline, 7 August, was six days ago. Anyone required to be in the regime who hasn’t yet submitted a Q1 update needs to check their position now, rather than waiting for the next one to catch up.

HMRC will start signing people up from September

HMRC confirmed on 12 August 2026 that more than 436,000 sole traders and landlords have now successfully sent their first MTD quarterly update, with over 570,000 customers signed up to the service overall. From September 2026, HMRC will begin signing up customers who should be using MTD for Income Tax for 2026/27 but haven’t done so themselves, working through them in stages over the following months. Anyone who signs up voluntarily now avoids being contacted this way and keeps control over the timing and software choice.

The Association of Taxation Technicians has previously flagged that around 850,000 landlords and sole traders were expected to come into MTD from April 2026, and that roughly a quarter of those affected don’t have an agent to help them through it. As Jon Stride, chair of the ATT’s Technical Steering Group, put it when the first-year penalty easement was announced: “those trying their best to comply but struggling shouldn’t be penalised” – but that goodwill doesn’t extend to simply not signing up at all.

The new penalty regime

Alongside MTD, HMRC is introducing a points based penalty system, moving away from the immediate fixed penalty approach used under standard Self Assessment. Quarterly filers accumulate a penalty point for each late submission; once four points are reached, a £200 penalty applies, followed by another £200 for each further late submission until compliance improves. Points expire automatically after 24 months if the threshold isn’t hit again. Late payment penalties are also tightening: 3% of tax overdue at 15 days, another 3% at 30 days, and 10% a year accruing daily on anything still outstanding after 31 days.

Why this catches people out

The “soft landing” HMRC has publicised for 2026/27 – no penalty points for late quarterly updates in the first year – has led some taxpayers to assume nothing is enforced yet. That’s not quite right: the soft landing only covers points for late quarterly updates. Penalties for a late tax return or late payment of tax still apply in full from day one. There’s also confusion over qualifying income itself – it’s gross turnover before expenses, and it’s based on last year’s return, not current-year figures. Anyone running both a trade and a rental property should check the combined figure rather than assuming each income source is judged separately.

What to check now

The threshold isn’t static either – it drops to £30,000 from April 2027 (based on 2025-26 income) and to £20,000 from April 2028 (based on 2026-27 income), pulling in a much wider group of sole traders and landlords over the next two tax years. Worth checking now, even if this year’s income sits comfortably under £50,000: confirm your qualifying income against last year’s return, get MTD-compatible software in place well before you’re required to use it, and if the 7 August update has been missed, get it submitted rather than letting a second deadline pass.

The shift to quarterly digital reporting is a genuine change in how HMRC expects records to be kept, not just a filing-date reshuffle. Getting the software and habits right now, while the penalty regime is still in its soft-landing year, is considerably easier than catching up once points start accumulating.

For further assistance or queries, please contact us.

Leeds: 0113 320 9284                                 Sheffield: 0114 272 4984

Email: info@shipleystax.com

Please note that Shipleys Tax do not give free advice by email or telephone. This article is intended for general information only and does not constitute tax or legal advice. Clients should seek professional guidance before making any decisions.

To Book a Consultation please fill the boxes below.

FOR YEARS, PENSIONS have been one of the few places a family could pass on wealth without inheritance tax getting involved. From April 2027, that changes. If your own planning assumed your pension sat outside your estate, it’s worth checking whether that’s still true.

What’s Actually Changing

The Finance Act 2026 received Royal Assent on 18 March 2026. From 6 April 2027, most unused pension funds and death benefits will count towards the estate for Inheritance Tax, taxed at 40% above the nil-rate band.

There are exceptions: death-in-service payments from a registered scheme remain exempt, as do transfers to a surviving spouse or civil partner. What’s new is the administrative burden too — personal representatives become responsible for reporting and paying any IHT due on pension funds, adding a layer of complexity to estate administration that many families haven’t planned for.

Why This Catches People Out

The pension change doesn’t arrive in isolation — it lands on top of a set of thresholds that have been quietly tightening for years. The standard nil-rate band has been frozen at £325,000 since 2009. The residence nil-rate band tapers away entirely for estates above £2 million. And UK IHT liabilities passed £7 billion for the first time this year (STEP, 30 July 2026).

Put together, a pension that used to sit safely outside the estate now adds directly to a total that’s already being squeezed from every other direction.

Who Should Be Reviewing Their Position Now

• Anyone with a meaningful pension pot they expect to pass on to family
• Estate plans built on the assumption that the pension sat outside the taxable estate
• SIPP or SSAS holders, where pension values can be substantial and flexible
• Couples relying on outdated first-death/second-death assumptions that predate this change

A Sense of Proportion

It’s worth saying plainly: fewer than 1 in 20 estates currently pay any Inheritance Tax at all (Today’s Wills and Probate). This isn’t a change that suddenly affects everyone.

But frozen thresholds, rising asset values, and pensions joining the estate from 2027 mean more families are being pulled into that minority every year — often without realising it until it’s too late to plan around.

If your own planning assumed a pension sat outside your estate, that assumption has changed. The only way to know where you actually stand is to look at the full picture — property, savings, pensions and reliefs together.

Check your position with our free, private IHT Wealth Health Check. It takes a few minutes, saves your progress if you need to come back to it, and gives you an indicative estimate by secure link.

Start your Wealth Health Check →

Final Thoughts

The pension rule change doesn’t mean every family needs to act immediately, but it does mean an assumption a lot of estate plans were built on no longer holds. A short review now — before April 2027 — is a much better position to be in than finding out after the fact.

For further assistance or queries, please contact us.

Leeds: 0113 320 9284                                 Sheffield: 0114 272 4984

Email: info@shipleystax.com

Please note that Shipleys Tax do not give free advice by email or telephone. This article is intended for general information only and does not constitute tax or legal advice. Clients should seek professional guidance before making any decisions.

Want more tax tips and news? Sign up to our newsletter below.

RECENT WARNINGS FROM advisers highlight a growing issue affecting UK expats returning from Dubai and the wider Gulf. Individuals who believed they had legitimately realised gains while non-resident are now facing unexpected UK tax bills—sometimes running into millions.

In today’s Shipleys Tax brief, we highlight a growing and often misunderstood risk for UK expats returning from Dubai and the Gulf: the UK’s temporary non-residence rules can effectively pull previously untaxed overseas gains back into the UK tax net. What appeared to be a clean, tax-free disposal abroad can quickly turn into a multi-million pound liability on return—particularly where individuals come back within five years or inadvertently trigger UK residence sooner than expected.

With HMRC likely to scrutinise high-value cases closely and limited reliance on “exceptional circumstances”, the margin for error is small. The key message is that timing, structure and residence status must be managed proactively—because once you are back in the UK, the planning window is often already closed.

Why Expats are affected

At the centre of the problem is a rule many people either misunderstand or are simply unaware of: the UK’s temporary non-residence rules. These are designed to prevent individuals from leaving the UK for a short period, disposing of valuable assets tax-free in low-tax jurisdictions such as Dubai, and then returning shortly afterwards.

In general terms, if you leave the UK, become non-resident, and then return within five tax years, HMRC can effectively “look back” and tax certain gains you made while abroad. The result is that a disposal which appeared entirely tax-free at the time can later fall back into the UK tax net.

The real-world impact

This is where many expats are being caught out. A common scenario involves the sale of a business or investment during a period of non-residence—often with no local tax in the UAE. However, if the individual returns to the UK too soon, those gains can be taxed here, typically in the year of return.

For larger transactions, the numbers quickly become significant. It is not unusual for individuals to face tax charges in the millions on gains they assumed were outside the UK system.

UK return tax issue

The position is made more complex by the Statutory Residence Test. Simply returning to the UK—even for reasons outside your control—can increase your UK “day count” and trigger tax residence earlier than expected.

Once UK residence is re-established, the temporary non-residence rules may apply. This means the timing of your return is often just as important as the transaction itself.

Case Study 1: £5m Exit → Unexpected UK Tax Charge

A UK entrepreneur moves to Dubai and becomes non-UK resident. During their time abroad, they sell their business for £5 million, realising a full £5 million gain with no local tax. Confident the position is tax-free, they return to the UK after three years. However, because they have not remained non-resident for five full tax years, the UK’s temporary non-residence rules apply. The gain is effectively brought back into the UK tax net and taxed in the year of return, creating a potential liability of around £1.2 million (at 24% CGT, assuming no reliefs). The issue is not the disposal itself—but the timing of the return.

Case Study 2: Extracting £100,000 from a UK Company While Abroad

An individual leaves the UK and becomes non-resident, while retaining ownership of a UK company. During their period overseas, they extract around £100,000 of profits from the company, assuming this can be done free of UK tax while living in Dubai. They later return to the UK within five years.

Because of the temporary non-residence rules, certain income received during the non-resident period can be caught when the individual becomes UK resident again. HMRC may treat those amounts as taxable in the year of return, meaning what was assumed to be tax-free extraction could instead give rise to an unexpected UK income tax liability. As with capital gains, the risk arises not at the point of extraction—but on returning to the UK within the five-year window.

Exceptional Circumstances

Some individuals have looked to rely on the “exceptional circumstances” provisions, which can allow up to 60 days in the UK to be disregarded where events such as war or travel disruption prevent someone from leaving.

However, this is not a ready made guaranteed solution. HMRC apply rules narrowly and it depends heavily on the specific facts. Where alternative travel options exist—such as relocating temporarily to another country rather than returning to the UK—HMRC may take the view that the exemption does not apply.

In practice, relying on this argument carries risk, particularly where large tax liabilities are involved.

A growing risk

In the current climate, this creates real uncertainty. Many expats have returned to the UK due to instability in the region, while others are considering whether to do so.

The difficulty is that the tax consequences are not always clear-cut, and HMRC is likely to examine high-value cases closely—especially where significant gains have been realised during a short period of non-residence.

Planning before your return

From a practical perspective, this is rarely a situation that can be resolved after the event. The timing of your return, your residence position, and the structure of any disposals all interact in ways that can significantly change the outcome.

In some cases, careful planning—such as delaying a return, restructuring transactions, or considering an interim move to a third country—can materially reduce the risk.

Key takeaway

Leaving the UK does not automatically mean your gains are outside the UK tax system. If there is any possibility of returning within certain time limits, those gains may still be within HMRC’s reach.

Need advice?

If you may have exposure to UK tax while living in Dubai or the Gulf—or are looking to optimise your position—it is essential to review your UK tax affairs before taking any action.

This article is for general information only and does not constitute professional advice. Shipleys Tax does not provide free advice by email or phone. You should seek tailored advice before taking any action.

For further assistance or queries, please contact us below:

Leeds: 0113 320 9284            Sheffield: 0114 272 4984      

Email: info@shipleystax.com

To discussion your tax position with a specialist please the complete the form below.

A significant VAT development for organisations using or supplying locum doctors

A recent tribunal decision, followed by HMRC accepting that it will revise its policy, has created a genuine opportunity for some organisations to revisit the VAT treatment of locum doctor supplies. For the right fact patterns, this may support historic refund claims. But this is not a blanket refund exercise, and the detail matters.

This issue can affect medical recruitment agencies, NHS bodies, private hospitals, clinics and other healthcare organisations that have either charged VAT on supplies of locum doctors or borne irrecoverable VAT on those supplies.

Business structuring

Business ownership structures: choosing the right vehicle

Companies vs LLPs, FICs vs direct ownership, EOTs vs trade sales, and holding companies vs simpler groups — the structure you choose can shape tax, control, flexibility and long-term family wealth.

As the UK tax environment tightens and historic reliefs narrow, strong outcomes are increasingly driven not by last-minute tax planning, but by how a business or investment is owned, structured and positioned for the future.

Whether you are growing a trading company, building a property portfolio, planning succession, or preparing for exit, structure is strategy. The wrong vehicle can quietly erode value, restrict options and expose you to unnecessary tax. The right one can support growth, unlock funding and preserve wealth over time.

Company vs LLP: certainty or flexibility?

One of the most common structural decisions is whether to operate through a limited company or a limited liability partnership.

Limited companies often appeal where owners want clearer separation between business profits and personal tax, stronger profit-retention options, access to share-based incentives, and cleaner eventual exit routes.

LLPs, by contrast, can still be attractive where flexibility matters most, particularly in advisory and professional environments.

However, LLPs now attract more scrutiny around partner status, disguised employment and NIC exposure. For many growing firms, the historic advantages have narrowed, while companies increasingly provide the more robust long-term platform.

FICs vs direct ownership

With inheritance tax receipts rising and nil-rate bands effectively constrained, many families are revisiting how valuable trading companies and investment assets are owned.

Direct ownership is simple, but simplicity often comes with trade-offs. Future growth remains in the individual estate, and flexibility on succession can be limited.

Family Investment Companies, when properly structured, can offer a more strategic framework.

That said, FICs are not a plug-and-play answer. Poor share rights, weak governance or unsuitable funding can create new tax issues and family tension. Used well, however, they remain one of the most effective long-term planning tools available.

EOTs vs trade sales

For founders looking ahead to exit, the choice between an Employee Ownership Trust and a trade sale is rarely just financial. It is also about legacy, control and timing.

EOTs can offer:

But they also come with real commercial constraints.

Trade sales may instead provide:

Increasingly, the most effective outcomes are not binary. We often see hybrid solutions, including staged exits, management buy-outs and partial EOT models designed to balance tax, funding and control.

Holding companies vs simpler groups

As businesses mature, the question often shifts from what entity should I trade through? to should I now introduce a holding company?

A well-designed group can add real strategic value.

But complexity for its own sake is rarely wise. Additional entities bring admin, cost and scrutiny. The strongest structures are purpose-led: simple in presentation, but powerful in operation.

Common structural mistakes

These mistakes do not usually fail immediately. They simply become expensive over time.

The Shipleys Tax view

Optimising structure is not about chasing loopholes or reacting late. It is about aligning ownership with where the business, family or investment strategy is actually heading.

Growth, external capital, succession and exit all pull in different directions. The right structure reconciles them before tax becomes a constraint.

The most expensive tax planning is often the kind done too late.

IN THE PAST decade, the UK property market has quietly undergone a structural revolution. What began as a tax-driven shift among higher-rate landlords has now become a mainstream trend — with over 70% of new buy-to-lets purchased through companies, and a growing number of investors treating their portfolios as businesses rather than side investments.

The reasons are clear. Frozen tax thresholds, rising mortgage rates, and the unpopular Section 24 restriction on mortgage interest relief have all squeezed traditional landlords, while larger and more professional investors — including overseas buyers and family offices — have quietly moved towards corporate ownership. This allows for lower tax rates, full deductibility of finance costs, and greater flexibility in reinvestment and succession planning.

At the same time, institutional capital continues to pour into the UK’s build-to-rent sector, with pension funds, private equity, and sovereign wealth investors acquiring or developing rental stock at scale. The message is unmistakable: whether you’re a single investor or managing a multi-million-pound portfolio, the property landscape now rewards structure, strategy, and scale.

However, incorporating property holdings is not a straight forward exercise. The potential tax benefits — from Corporation Tax savings to mortgage interest relief and succession planning — must be balanced against complex rules on Capital Gains Tax (CGT), Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT), and legislative anti-avoidance. Done correctly, it can transform how you manage and grow your portfolio. Done wrong, it can trigger large unexpected tax bills and HMRC scrutiny.

In today’s Shipleys Tax insight, we take a closer look at when, how, and whether property investors, landlords, and developers — in the UK and abroad — should consider incorporating their portfolios, and how to structure the move in a way that is commercially robust, compliant, and future-proof.

The shifting sands…

UK investment property is increasingly held through companies, not personal names. Various datasets show the direction of travel:

• 70–75% of new buy-to-let purchases now go into companies, and the stock of company-owned BTLs keeps rising. 
• 2025 has seen a surge in newly incorporated BTL companies (c. 67k expected), including more international landlords using UK companies. 
• On the institutional side, Build-to-Rent continues to scale: 2025 updates show rising capital deployment and a deepening pipeline of professionally managed rental homes — i.e. corporate ownership at scale. 

Why this matters: whether you own five units or fifty, the market (and lenders) increasingly assumes a corporate wrapper. That doesn’t mean incorporation is always right—but it does mean you should evaluate it properly.

Why more investors are going limited – summary points

• Tax rate arbitrage (corporation vs personal): Company profits are taxed at 19–25%, versus personal rates up to 45% for landlords. 
• Finance cost deductibility: Companies can still deduct 100% of mortgage interest (unlike Section 24-restricted individuals). 

• Reinvestment & scale: Retaining profits inside the company can make it easier to fund capex and acquisitions (and often plays better with lenders as your portfolio grows). Industry evidence shows professional/portfolio and institutional investors are leaning this way. 
• Succession options: With the right share design, you can plan control, income and eventual handover far more neatly than with personally-owned bricks and mortar.

Institutions are not doing this by accident. The rise of professionally managed rental (BTR/single-family) is a clear signal that corporate ownership is the default for scalable portfolios. 

Property tripwires

Moving assets from you to your company can trigger tax and lending events. Common pitfalls we regularly help clients avoid:

• CGT at market value on transfer unless qualifying reliefs can be applied.
• SDLT on the company’s acquisition price, including surcharges — partnership routes and genuine business status matter.

• Mortgage reset risk: lenders may re-price or require a new facility when title changes.
• Anti-abuse scrutiny: “form-over-substance” restructures invite HMRC challenge.

These can often be managed with commercially robust planning—but only if mapped before you pull the trigger.

Where Shipleys Tax advice fits

Shipleys Tax act for landlords, developers and cross-border investors who want the benefits of a company without the nasty pitfalls:

• Feasibility modelling: side-by-side projections (personal vs company) so you can see the real after-tax outcome.
• Reliefs & route selection: assessing whether you’re a genuine property business, if partnership routes make sense, and how to minimise/mitigate CGT/SDLT on transfer.
• Banking & debt coordination: working with your broker/lender so finance aligns with the structure (and the timetable).
• Succession & wealth planning: company share design, Family Investment Company (FIC) options, and clean governance for future exits.
• Ongoing compliance: accounts, corporation tax, VAT where relevant—and steady optimisation as rules shift.

Conclusion

Incorporating your property portfolio isn’t a simple formula — but for many serious investors, it has become the foundation of modern, scalable property investment. A company structure can open the door to lower tax rates, full finance deductibility, reinvestment flexibility, and far more controlled succession planning.

However, success lies not in the decision but in the execution. The process must be commercially justified, carefully modelled, and compliant with HMRC’s rules on reliefs and anti-avoidance. A poorly timed or poorly structured incorporation can easily erode the very benefits it was meant to deliver.

At Shipleys Tax, we specialise in helping landlords and investors navigate that fine line — turning complex legislation into practical, tax-efficient strategies.

For further assistance or queries, please contact:

Sheffield: 0114 303 7076                        Leeds: 0113 320 9284               Manchester: 0161 850 1655 

Email: info@shipleystax.com

Please note that Shipleys Tax do not give free advice by email or telephone. The content of this article is for general guidance only and should not be considered as tax or professional advice. Always consult with a qualified professional before taking action.

Want more tax tips and news? Sign up to our newsletter below.

HMRC HAS REVIVED powers allowing it to take money directly from taxpayers’ bank accounts to settle unpaid tax debts. These so-called “direct recovery” powers apply to debts over £1,000, though HMRC must leave at least £5,000 across your accounts after any deduction.

While HMRC insists this is targeted only at “persistent non-payers”, the move is a serious escalation in debt collection and risks catching out individuals and businesses who may not realise they have an outstanding liability.

In today’s Shipleys Tax brief, we summarise how it works, the safeguards in place, and what you should do to protect yourself.

What’s Happening?

HMRC has re-started use of its Direct Recovery of Debts (DRD) powers, allowing it to take money directly from taxpayers’ bank accounts where tax bills remain unpaid.

According to HMRC’s own briefing, updated 22 September 2025, DRD is again being used after being paused during the pandemic (HMRC – Issue Briefing: Direct Recovery of Debts).

These powers apply to debts of £1,000 or more, but HMRC must leave at least £5,000 across your accounts after any deduction. The rules are set out in HMRC’s policy paper on DRD (HMRC policy paper).

Why Now?

The scheme was first legislated previously but paused during Covid. HMRC has now confirmed DRD is being reintroduced on a “test and learn” basis to help tackle rising levels of unpaid tax.

Professional advisers have warned that while the target is “persistent non-payers”, errors, disputed liabilities, or overlooked correspondence could mean ordinary taxpayers are at risk if they don’t engage early with HMRC.

What Does This Mean for You?

• All taxpayers are potentially affected — individuals, landlords, and businesses.
• Outstanding debts as low as £1,000 can trigger DRD action.
• Safeguards exist (such as notice, objections and appeals), but the process relies on HMRC’s accuracy.

For clients, this means you should:

• Review your HMRC correspondence and ensure no liabilities are outstanding.
• Deal with disputes early before HMRC escalates collection.
• Get professional advice if you receive a DRD notice.

How Shipleys Tax Can Help

At Shipleys Tax, we specialise in defending clients against HMRC enforcement action. We can:

• Negotiate affordable payment arrangements before HMRC acts.
• Challenge incorrect or disputed demands.
• Protect your cashflow and ensure safeguards are applied properly.

Conclusion

Don’t wait until HMRC knocks on your door (or bank account). If you have unresolved tax issues — even relatively small debts — now is the time to act.

Book a confidential consultation with Shipleys Tax today to safeguard your finances and gain peace of mind against any HMRC enforcement action.

HMRC Direct Recovery of Debts – Frequently Asked Questions

Can HMRC really take money directly from my bank account?

Yes. Under its Direct Recovery of Debts (DRD) powers, HMRC can instruct banks and building societies to transfer unpaid tax directly from your accounts. This power was re-started in September 2025 after being paused during the pandemic.

How much must HMRC leave in my account?

HMRC must leave you with at least £5,000 across all accounts after any deduction. The powers only apply where the debt owed is £1,000 or more.

Will HMRC warn me before taking money?

Yes. HMRC must give you advance notice and an opportunity to object or appeal before any funds are recovered. They will also assess whether you are “vulnerable” and require additional support.

What if I dispute the debt?

If you disagree with HMRC’s figures or the debt is under appeal, you can challenge the action. Professional advice is strongly recommended — errors and disputes can and do occur.

Who is most at risk?

Anyone with unresolved HMRC liabilities could be affected — individuals, landlords, self-employed workers, and businesses. While HMRC says DRD targets “persistent non-payers”, the safest approach is to resolve outstanding matters early.

For further assistance or queries, please contact:

Sheffield: 0114 303 7076                        Leeds: 0113 320 9284                 

Email: info@shipleystax.com

Please note that Shipleys Tax do not give free advice by email or telephone. The content of this article is for general guidance only and should not be considered as tax or professional advice. Always consult with a qualified professional before taking action.

Want more tax tips and news? Sign up to our newsletter below.

DOCTORS AND NHS medical professionals may be hit with tax penalties after the NHS Business Services Authority (NHSBSA) admitted to “gross errors” in calculating pension contributions, according to reports. According to the British Medical Association (BMA), nearly 800 doctors were issued with incorrect pension savings statements for the 2023/24 tax year.

In today’s Shipleys Tax brief we look at the latest NHS pension blunder that has left many doctors and consultants at risk of HMRC penalties. Errors in annual allowance calculations mean some GPs cannot finalise their tax returns on time, creating unnecessary stress and possible charges. Here’s what’s gone wrong, why it matters, and—most importantly—what to do now.

What’s gone wrong?

According to the BMA, at least 757 doctors were issued incorrect 2023/24 Pension Savings Statements (PSS). The error relates to the opening value for 2023/24, which was wrongly increased by an extra 1.5% on top of the 10.1% CPI revaluation set by law. This produced incorrect Pension Input Amounts (PIAs) and has made accurate self-assessment difficult for affected clinicians. The NHSBSA has acknowledged the error and indicated the PIA shown was lower than it should have been. 

What does HMRC say?

HMRC allows you to file on time using the best available (provisional) figures and amend within 12 months of the filing deadline without a late-filing penalty. Do note that interest can still apply if extra tax becomes due on amendment. NHSBSA guidance mirrors this approach for affected members. 

Annual allowance refresher – why this is an issue

• Standard annual allowance: £60,000.
• Tapered allowance: if threshold income > £200,000 and adjusted income > £260,000, the allowance tapers down to a minimum of £10,000 at higher adjusted incomes. 

Practical steps for doctors to take now

1. Identify if you’re affected – check your 2023/24 PSS and any NHSBSA letters; note the 1.5% opening value issue. 
2. File by the deadline using estimates – protect yourself from late-filing penalties; diarise to amend within 12 months when the corrected PSS arrives. 
3. Retain evidence – keep NHSBSA/BMA correspondence and workings you used for your estimate.
4. Re-work your position – use payslips and prior statements to sense-check likely PIA and possible carry-forward.
5. Use carry-forward – bring in unused allowances from the previous three years to reduce any annual-allowance charge (where eligible).
6. Assess taper risk – if you’re around the £200k–£260k thresholds, get advice to avoid inadvertent taper traps. 
7. Claim your costs – if you’ve incurred extra accountancy fees or interest solely because of this error, the NHSBSA will consider reimbursement. Keep invoices and bank proof. 
8. Amend promptly – when your corrected PSS arrives, submit the amendment to limit interest and tidy up your records. 

Why this matters for medical professionals

The NHS pension is a major and valuable benefit. However, complex annual allowance and taper rules can create unexpected tax charges and discourage extra sessions—administrative errors only make the situation worse. Specialist advice helps ensure you pay the right tax—no more, no less. 

Conclusion – take professional advice

At Shipleys Tax, we specialise in advising GPs, consultants and healthcare professionals on NHS pension tax. We regularly:

• Check, amend and appeal incorrect pension tax calculations;
• Structure earnings to minimise annual-allowance exposure and protect retirement wealth;
• Handle filings on time—even where provisional figures are needed—and tidy up once corrected data arrives.

Concerned about your NHS pension statement or potential tax penalties? Contact us below:

Sheffield: 0114 303 7076                        Leeds: 0113 320 9284                 

Email: info@shipleystax.com

Please note that Shipleys Tax do not give free advice by email or telephone. The content of this article is for general guidance only and should not be considered as tax or professional advice. Always consult with a qualified professional before taking action.

Want more tax tips and news? Sign up to our newsletter below.

GIVEN THE INCREASE in property values, frozen IHT thresholds, and increasing scrutiny of trusts and estate planning by HMRC, more estates than ever are being pulled into the IHT net. One common strategy for reducing Inheritance Tax (IHT) is putting property or savings into trust. Done correctly, it can remove assets from an estate entirely, helping families reduce their exposure to tax on death. But where the arrangements are poorly implemented or the settlor remains involved, things can go badly wrong.

In today’s Shipleys Tax brief, we look at a recent Tribunal case which highlights a common – and costly – trap in inheritance tax (IHT) planning and to how to avoid this. HMRC successfully argued that over £440,000 in trust assets remained taxable on death — despite IHT planning documents suggesting otherwise. The case serves as a warning on how easy it is to fall foul of IHT rules, even with well-intentioned planning and where the practical impact of the planning is not fully thought through. With further reforms under discussion, it’s likely that reliance on informal or outdated planning will face even greater challenge from HMRC.

The Plan

Many individuals put property or savings into trust thinking it will reduce the value of their estate for IHT purposes. Done correctly, this can work in many cases. But done carelessly – or worse, informally – it can unravel years later, with substantial tax implications.

In essence, that is exactly what happened in a recent case before the First-tier Tribunal, where a family’s well-meaning trust planning failed to exclude over £440,000 from the estate. Despite trust documents stating the assets had been given away, the deceased’s continued involvement meant HMRC was able to include them in the death estate – unfortunately triggering a significant IHT charge after death.

A Family Trust

Back in 2000, Mr Mohammed Chugtai effectively set up two trusts, one covering a semi-detached property and shop, where his daughter lived – and the other covering a bank account into which rent and other income was paid.

In the trusts his children were named as beneficiaries and Mr Chugtai gave up all rights to benefit from the assets. But as it turned out, the reality didn’t quite reflect the legal paperwork.

Over the next 17 years, Mr Chugtai continued to live in the property, ran a retail business from the shop, and used the trust-held bank account to pay personal and household bills. Even a personal tax bill was settled from that account. When the shop was eventually rented out, the income was declared on his personal tax returns – not by the trust.

Although his motivation was to care for a vulnerable daughter – and no one disputed the family circumstances – HMRC took the view that he never truly gave up benefit of either asset. Unfortunately for the Chugtai family the Tribunal agreed.

Why It Went Wrong

This case is a textbook example of what can go wrong when Inheritance Tax Planning is implemented without full and careful follow-through. While the legal structure appeared sound on paper, the deceased continued to behave as though he still controlled and benefited from the assets.

The Tribunal focused on what happened in practice:

• Was rent paid for living in the property?
• Why utility bills and council tax were paid from the trust-held account
• Income and savings continued to flow through the trust-held account.
• The deceased used the shop for business purposes and later for rental income.

The trust deeds clearly excluded him from benefiting. But the Tribunal was clear that actions speak louder than words and hence superseded the legal paperwork.

The judge even commented: “Fine words butter no parsnips” – meaning that well-drafted documents are irrelevant if they’re not matched by practical action.

The Bigger Problem: Common Tax Traps

Cases like this are more common than many realise. Clients often set up trusts with the right intentions but fail to separate themselves from the assets. This might be for practical reasons – ease of use, reluctance to let go of control, or simply not realising that everyday behaviour can have tax consequences.

Even helping a family member can become problematic. The Tribunal acknowledged that Mr Chugtai’s primary reason for returning to the property was to care for his daughter, but that, unfortunately, motive is not a defence when assessing tax liability. The benefit to him – free accommodation, access to funds – was sufficient to render the planning ineffective.

How to Avoid This Hidden Tax Trap – Basics

Inheritance tax planning using trusts can be very effective. But it must be implemented carefully and consistently. Here are some key issues to be aware of:

• Giving up ownership is not enough – you must also give up control and benefit.
• Using the same property or account after gifting it can undo the planning.
• Trust records, accounts and tax returns need to be maintained properly.
• HMRC looks at what actually happened – not just what’s written in the deed.

There are legitimate ways to mitigate IHT even where the donor continues to have some connection with the asset – but these require clear planning and robust documentation.

In this case (and with the benefit of hindsight), there were better alternatives that might have achieved the family’s goals, preserved care for the daughter, and reduced the IHT burden – but they were not followed.

Final Thoughts

This case is a cautionary tale for clients and advisers alike. It shows how even well-intentioned inheritance tax planning can backfire if the legal form isn’t matched by practical substance.

Trusts remain a powerful tool for wealth protection and estate planning – but they demand attention to detail, proper administration, and a genuine transfer of benefit and control.

In some cases, personal or family circumstances can change significantly over time, making it difficult — or even impossible — to implement the original advice as intended. In such situations, it’s vital to seek timely follow-up advice to ensure the planning remains effective and compliant

If you’re considering using trusts in your IHT strategy, or if you already have one in place, now is the time to review it. The cost of inaction – as one family learned – can run into hundreds of thousands.

For further assistance or queries, please contact us.

Leeds: 0113 320 9284                                 Sheffield: 0114 272 4984

Email: info@shipleystax.com

Please note that Shipleys Tax do not give free advice by email or telephone. This article is intended for general information only and does not constitute tax or legal advice. Clients should seek professional guidance before making any decisions.

Want more tax tips and news? Sign up to our newsletter below.

WITH THE INEXORABLE rise of Gen Z influencers, vloggers and digital-first entrepreneurs, HMRC is quietly sharpening its tools — and its focus. What perhaps started as hobbies, gifted skincare or side-hustle brand collabs (collaborations), has now evolved into a full-blown economy, some with an international dimension. And the taxman, no doubt, is watching…

The Taxman Really Is Watching

From YouTube and TikTok to affiliate marketing and Patreon subscriptions, content monetisation and marketing has not gone unnoticed by HMRC. In recent years, the tax authority has:

• Used AI-driven algorithms to flag high-risk accounts and cross-check undeclared income
• Secured data-sharing agreements with major platforms to identify high-earning creators
• Scanned public content hashtags like #ad or #gifted, brand mentions and sponsored posts
• Issued compliance letters and launched investigations into unreported influencer income or “free” gifts

Whether you’re being paid to promote skincare on Instagram, monetising a YouTube channel, or receiving “gifted” products in exchange for exposure, the question of taxation is not just “on trend” — it’s essential.

In today’s Shipleys Tax note, we look at the key UK tax considerations for influencers and content creators, outline common pitfalls, and offer practical advice for staying on the right side of the taxman. Whether you’re just starting out or scaling your platform into a business, these insights could save you money, stress and an unwelcome call from the Taxman.

I Didn’t Know That Was Taxable…

Many influencers don’t realise that non-cash compensation — like beauty bundles, luxury trips, free gear or affiliate perks — may all be treated as taxable income by HMRC if given in exchange for something, e.g. publicity or promotion.

We’re seeing a marked increase in enquiries from content creators caught out by unexpected tax bills, VAT thresholds, or vague records around “freebies”. The tax rules are evolving — but HMRC’s expectation is clear: if you’re earning, even in kind, it needs to be declared.

Summary Tax Rules For UK Content Creators

Whether you’re a full-time vlogger or running a content side hustle, you need to understand your obligations. Here’s what to keep in mind:

What Counts as Taxable Income?

Most forms of influencer income are taxable. This includes:

• Paid brand collaborations and sponsored posts
• Ad revenue from platforms like YouTube, TikTok or Instagram
• Affiliate marketing commissions
• Event appearances and speaking fees
• “Gifted” products or services with promotional strings attached
• Transfers of assets in lieu

Tip: HMRC values non-cash gifts at market rate. That free trip or high tech camera? It’s potentially income. However, where the item has been donated for an online review here it can get murky.

Maximise Tax Efficiency with These Key Allowances

1. £1,000 Trading Allowance

You don’t need to declare income under £1,000 — useful for micro-influencers testing monetisation.

2. Claim Legitimate Business Expenses

Claim what you use for your content, such as:

• Cameras, mics, ring lights
• Editing software
• Travel
• Home office costs
• PR, legal and accountancy fees

Tip: Lifestyle items (e.g. designer handbags) rarely qualify as business expenses. However, knowing what to legitimately claim as a business expense can greatly reduce any taxable income.

Pitfalls to Avoid

• Ignoring Smaller Payments: All income must be declared if over the threshold
• Overlooking Gifted Items: These are often taxable if given in exchange for promotion
• VAT Blind Spots: You must register for VAT if turnover exceeds the current VAT threshold.
• Poor Record-Keeping: No records could mean denied deductions or worse. Especially when Making Tax Digital for Income Tax comes online (2026) the need for good record keeping will be crucial and penalties will apply for failure to comply.

Tip: definitely use a separate bank account (any personal account will do) for social media earnings and paying for costs.

Basic Tax Planning Strategies for Content Creators

If your content is earning real money, plan ahead:

1. Form a Limited Company

Once income passes £30–50k, incorporation may offer tax efficiency:

• Corporation tax (19–25%)
• Salary/dividend flexibility
• Limited liability

2. Income Structuring

Involving a spouse/partner? Structuring as a partnership or limited company may allow you to use their allowances to save money

3. Pension Contributions

Tax-deductible and helps build long-term savings.

4. Annual Investment Allowance

Claim 100% relief on business-related capital expenses (up to £1m).

5. Flat Rate VAT Scheme

Simplifies VAT and improves cash flow for some creators.

Important: These strategies are not one-size-fits-all. Creator income structures vary — from cash to crypto, brand equity to international deals. Always seek professional advice tailored to your specific set-up before acting.

Staying HMRC-Compliant: The Five Essentials

1. Register with HMRC (self-employed or company)
2. File your Self Assessment by 31 January
3. Keep clear records of all income, expenses, and gifts
4. Budget 25–30% of earnings for tax
5. Speak to a Tax Adviser at the earliest opportunity

When to Speak to a Specialist

It is best talk to a qualified adviser like Shipleys Tax as early as possible, however we recommend the following general guidelines:

• You earnings are rapidly increasing
• You receive international payments, crypto, or equity
• You’re thinking about tax planning strategies
• You’re behind on filings or have received a letter from HMRC
• For high-earning creators and entrepreneurs, the freedom to work from anywhere presents unique tax planning opportunities that are worth exploring.

The Final Cut: Your Channel is Your Business

So treat it like one. Success online has tax consequences offline which sometimes can be overlooked. If you’re building a content brand, the HMRC expects you to act like an actual business. Set up the right structure, track your earnings, and get advice early — before the algorithm or HMRC knocks at the bedroom door.

For further assistance or queries, please contact us.

Contact Us page

Email: info@shipleystax.com

Please note that Shipleys Tax do not give free advice by email or telephone. The content of this article is for general guidance only and should not be considered as tax or professional advice. Always consult with a qualified professional before taking action.

Want more tax tips and news? Sign up to our newsletter below.